Personally, that is a scary recognition. I have always wanted to be the one to make the decisions but feel reserved because of the ramifications that come with being the person who pushes the button. Over the past few years, it is more apparent that if I don't push the button then no one else may. Therefore, I am officially volunteering as the button pusher! lol
What does that really mean? Well, sometimes it's as simple as the office product commercials tell me it is, easy. This doesn't have anything to do with being a non-conformist or trend setter but rather doing right by me.
Negotiate and compromise have become bad words. People make self-promoting statements regarding their unwillingness to bend/change or compromise who they are and for what they stand. I can sympathize with the personal conviction and desire to stick to something at all costs. These concepts/beliefs are paramount when navigating the world where everyone seems only vested in their own best interest.
However, in groups that function best as a whole vs. individually as pieces, these methods must be observed in moderation. The current political stalemate is a prime example; if I can get what I want without yielding on anything I believe strongly about then I'm in. This is an ineffective and counter intuitive position because the outcome will always be the same...nothing. No one ever wants to constantly be the giver in a relationship and likewise no one should ever be a habitual taker. As a society, we compromise all the time; when navigating traffic, picking government officials, and even choosing where to eat when our favorite place is packed. I'll admit that not all of those decisions carry equal weight and for that sound thought should be given to those with the ability to significantly impact our lives.
What about love? Historically, it was forbidden to marry outside one's class or "kind". The theme that people should be free to choose who they love has been echoed throughout movies, books, and music. And for the most part, these stories/tales are well received. So why is it not so in real life?
I have a difficult time understanding the negative consequences of allowing others to make their own choices. For example, I recognize the controversy surrounding the current topics of gun control, marijuana legalization, and abortion. Either allowing or banning any of these has complicated consequences that should be discussed and debated. Unrestricting marriage does not belong with them. These are people that want to pursue their dreams in ways that currently aren't allowed or universally protected. What someone else chooses to do or not do does not compromise my beliefs. There should be no negotiation on their feelings. In the end, it's just the right thing to do.